Friday Music: Mark E. Smith and The Fall

The times they are a-changin', just a little, I think. The music news site TwentyFourBit reports:

"Taking the stage in a wheelchair after your hip breaks for the second time is pretty punk rock, we think."

Image description: A black-and-white photo of Smith giving a grimacing smile or snarl to the camera. He's 52 now (though he looks older) and missing a couple teeth.

When Mark E. Smith, lead singer and sole original member of the post-punk rock band, performed with his current line-up for The Fall this past Tuesday and Wednesday, he sang first from the wheelchair he is currently using and then, for the end of the Wednesday show, from the dressing room backstage. NME has further details, including a somewhat less punk rock subheadline (in italics):

Recovering singer adopts unusual singing position as he recovers from hip injury

The Fall played London's KOKO last night (April 1), with Mark E Smith performing most of the gig from a wheelchair - before he abandoned the stage altogether and sung from his dressing room.

Currently recovering from a broken hip, the frontman, dressed in a black leather jacket, wheeled himself around the stage to alter settings on the band members' equipment before moving to sit behind a guitar amp for most of the concert.

The last three songs were performed with Smith singing from the dressing room, and changing the lyrics to 'Blindness' to say: "I refused to go onto the stage at one point / You'll get over it in the morning".

The song "Blindness", from the 2005 album Fall Heads Roll, has rather impenetrable lyrics (at least two previous versions) where the first-person narrator only has one leg. I am not enough of a cult follower of The Fall to know if this is or is not a reference to Smith's first hip injury in 2004 when he completed part of an American tour from a wheelchair before pain and medication reportedly caused some canceled dates.

Anyway, here are those lyrics:

BLINDNESS

The flag is evil
Welcome: living leg-end

I was walking down the street
I saw a poster at the top

I was only on one leg
The streets were fucked

And the poster at the top of street said:
“Do you work hard?”

I was only on one leg
The road hadn't been fixed
I had to be in for half six

I was only on one leg
My blue eyelids were not (?)
There was a curfew at half nine
For my kids

There was a poster at the top of the street
Encapsulated in plastic
It had a blind man

So I said: “Blind man, have mercy on me.”
I said: “Blind man, have mercy on me.”

The flat is evil and full of cavalry and Calvary
And calvary and cavalry.

“Do you work hard?”
It said, “I am from Hebden Bridge.
Somebody said to me: I can't understand a word you said."

Said: “99% of non smokers die”
“Do you work hard?”
“Do you work hard?”

I was walking down the street
And saw a picture of a blind man

The flat is evil
Of core? cavalry and calvary

Of core(?)
Blind man, have mercy on me
Said, blind man, have mercy on me

??
I am a ?
My blues eye get…ID/I get
My curfew was due half eight
Now its half past six

My curfew is at 9:30
I said. “Do you?”
Blind man! Have mercy on me
Blind man! Have mercy on me
Blind man! Have mercy on me

I’m on one leg
My eyes can’t get fixed
And my kids
Can’t blue eyes get fixed

Blind man! Have mercy on me
Blind man! Have mercy on me


BLINDNESS (Peel session version)

And all humans
Cavalry or calvary
And not a drop of water
Or paper
Or paper
J.W. said "walking bass, walking bass"
Don't forget, don't forget
He expected Aristotle Onasis
But instead he got Mr James Fennings from Prestwick, in Cumbria
Do you... reflect this evil?
Thought of cavalry and calvary
His first appearance was on Moscow Road
The poster came at first
At first I thought it was just a poster
I was talking to James Seymour
Eyes wide open
The neck was slightly dislocated
But then I walked up the street
There was a repellent plastic
Said poster with a picture
Do you work?
I was on one leg
At the top of the street
There was a poster
A plastic front
From Moscow Road it came
From Deansgate it came
From Narnack Records it came
I was on one leg
I had to be in by 9.30
I said walking bass
Paper times 2
Paper times 2
Paper everywhere and not a drop of water to be seen
I said
I was by the ocean
I saw a poster
I am [?]
I am [?]
Everywhere I look I see a blind man
I see a blind man
Everywhere I look
I see a...
I can't get my eyes checked
My blues eyes can't get checked
I'm only one leg
I said to poster, "When's the curfew over?
I said, "Blind man, have mercy on me."
I said, "Blind man, have mercy on me."
Blind man have mercy on me
Oh Great One I am a mere receptacle
The egg tester for your sandlewood and other assorted woods
In dark green
Blind man have mercy on me
I got a metal leg - truth
Flat is the evil of calvary and cavalry

Anyone want to interpret that?

About the times a-changin': If singing from a wheelchair is now considered "pretty punk rock", recall that in 1974 Robert Wyatt of Soft Machine, performing on the British TV show Top of the Pops just a year after an accident left him paralyzed, was considered "not suitable for family viewing" because of his wheelchair.

On the other hand, when has punk rock ever been suitable for family viewing?

Further sources to enjoy:

BBC News interview with Smith in May, 2008

The Fall wiki

Mark E. Smith wiki

the band's website

YouTube video of "Victoria", perhaps The Fall's most recognizable hit, from the 1988 album The Frenz Experiment

YouTube video of a live performance of "Blindness"

YouTube video of a concert performance of "Totally Wired" from the 1980 album Grotesque (After the Gramme)

When the wheels make the man, part 7

From newsday.com, we get this headline:

Woman accused in wheelchair death faces homicide charge

Yeah. The death was actually that of a human being, a man using a motorized wheelchair. It was a hit-and-run. The woman appears to have been intoxicated. Also, the man who died, Ranford Beckford, 51, was driving his wheelchair on the road's shoulder about a mile from his home.

My personal opportunities for driving along a roadside usually were caused by either lack of curb cuts or lack of adequate, accessible transportation. Or both.

Because you are nothing without your assistive equipment. See parts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 of this series.

When the wheels make the man, part 6

For the first time in this series, the wheelchair makes the woman instead of the man. Not really an improvement.

From the Australia Courier Mail, a headline about a man stalking a woman:

Man, 82, accused of stalking wheelchair woman, 65

Actually, both people in this report use wheelchairs though the headline characterizes only her as a "wheelchair person." If the news report can be trusted more than the headline, the woman's request in court to have the man designated as a stalker is based on one experience where the man "drove straight at her, swerving away only at the last moment."

That's understandably frightening. But in itself it could indicate the man's lack of driving ability of own wheelchair rather than stalking. The report doesn't indicate he followed the woman or repeatedly drove at her. If malice was intended, that would be reason to mention a wheelchair in the headline, with respect to the suspect and not the victim. It would be nice, when a news agency covers a story, if they'd not selectively use one person's status as a wheelchair user as a de facto indicator of victimhood.

Because you are nothing without your assistive equipment. See parts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of this series.

When the wheels make the man, part 5

From Dayton, Ohio, a man who uses a wheelchair burgles a restaurant four times in one week. Naturally, the headline about it reads:

Wheelchair burglar raids restaurant four times in week

It wouldn't have to read as if the man was stealing wheelchairs too. In fact, it wouldn't have to mention the wheelchair at all, except that is apparently what makes this crime newsworthy.

Here's an actual, alternate headline:

Police: Man In Wheelchair Is 4X Burglar

The body of both stories is exactly the same AP report.


Because you are nothing without your assistive equipment. See parts 1, 2, 3 and 4 of this series.

When the wheels make the man, part 4

Out of Spokane, Washington, news of a man who uses a wheelchair falsely reporting being assaulted. The Washington state TV station KXLY offered this headline on Tuesday:

Police: Man made up wheelchair assault story

No, a wheelchair was not assaulted or even alleged to have been assaulted. The man who made up the assault uses one to get around.

Further coverage has been somewhat better. The Seattle Times reports that depression over the holiday season led Kenneth Koch to stab himself, then lie to a friend who took him to the hospital for treatment of the wounds. From there, police were called and the lie snowballed into media coverage and people offering the man money.

Because you are nothing without your assistive equipment. See parts 1, 2 and 3 of this series.

When the wheels make the man, part 3

From the Sunday Mail in the UK, we get this headline:

Wheelchair pervert David Bennie jailed for decade of child abuse

No, the man was not being perverted with a wheelchair. He just sits in one, though the brief news story does end with the suggestion that he's faking his disability:

A WHEELCHAIR-BOUND paedophile has been jailed for four years for a decade of sex attacks.

David Bennie, 47, won three children's trust before subjecting them to depraved attacks.

The widower would strip during "naked nights" at his home and urged the youngsters to do the same.

He abused two sisters from when they were 12 until they turned 16.

Bennie also tried to force a 16-year-old boy to have sex with another man.

He showed hardcore porn to the children at his home in Irvine between 1996 and 2007.

The ex-railwayman was jailed at Kilmarnock Sheriff Court last week after being earlier convicted of lewd and libidinous behaviour and sexual assault. He was put on the sex offenders register indefinitely.

Bennie was wheeled into court by relatives but one victim claimed it was a sham and that he chased her upstairs and into the garden, stopping when he feared being seen on his feet.

Of course, use of a wheelchair never precludes the total ability to walk -- many, many people use wheelchairs because they help with various details of mobility, not because they are incapable of walking at all.

Because you are nothing without your assistive equipment. See parts 1 and 2 of this series.

Lame Duck

Image description: A color cartoon drawing of a white duck with George Bush's head and one hand, but a duck bill for a mouth. He's holding the red hotline phone and there's a cast on one duck foot. The cast has the seal of the president on it.

Like most people I know, it's been a refreshing change these past couple weeks to see how mostly toothless Bush appears after so many years of his callous destructiveness. But I tire of hearing the term "lame duck." It is ableist, of course, yet so ubiquitous most people don't think about it.

A "lame duck" is, literally, one that cannot keep up with the flock, and the primary definition provided by Merriam-Webster is "one that is weak or that falls behind in ability or achievement."

According to The Phrase Finder, the earliest recorded use of the term as a metaphor dates to 1761 and investors in the London Stock Exchange who couldn't pay their debts. Along with "bull market" and "bear market," "lame duck" was part of 18th-century stock trading lingo. How that came to be may or may not have something to do with the British game cricket:

In Horace Walpole's Letters to Sir Horace Mann, 1761, we have:

"Do you know what a Bull, and a Bear, and a Lame Duck are?"

In 1771, David Garrick, in Prologue to Foote's Maid of Bath wrote:

"Change-Alley bankrupts waddle out lame ducks!"

In 1772, the Edinburgh Advertiser included:

"Yesterday being the settling day for India stock, the bulls had a balance to pay to the bears to the amount of 23 per cent. Only one lame duck waddled out of the alley, and that for no greater a sum than 20,000."

We are still familiar with the terms 'bull market' and 'bear market', referring to rising and falling markets respectively, but 'lame duck' in the specifically stock trading context is now little used.

Why should someone who has no assets be called a 'duck'? Could it be related to the cricketing term, 'out for a duck' - used when a batman is out without scoring any runs? It seems not. That term is much later and refers to the zero on the scoreboard being similar to a duck's egg. First used in 1867, in G. H. Selkirk's Guide to Cricket Grounds:

"If he makes one run he has 'broken his duck's egg'."

The term made its way to American politics, with the first reference here in 1863 and the first presidential reference about Calvin Coolidge in 1926. Back then, out-going politicians had about 60 days longer to wreak havoc before newly elected representatives took office. The 20th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, also sometimes referred to as the Lame Duck Amendment, shortened that time to it's current length, with new Congressional members taking office on January 3 and the president on January 20 following November elections.

"Lame duck" is particularly ableist since its current use refers not only to the decreased political power of elected officials who are slated to be replaced but also to the lack of accountability those politicians face. The daily "Quackitude" report on The Rachel Maddow Show on MSNBC, for example, covers both instances where Bush seems to be conceding his position to Obama already and the executive orders that reveal a gross misuse of power by bypassing legislative approval of things like uranium mining along the Colorado River.

I love Maddow and her show, but here's the relevant part of the November 7 show transcript that puts it all together under "Lame Duck Watch":
MADDOW:

We elected a new president this week, but there are still 10 scary weeks left of the Bush administration when anything can happen and most likely will.

And so we are back with another installment of our public service series, the RACHEL MADDOW SHOW "Lame Duck Watch" because somebody has to do it.

On the agenda at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, in the last couple days, nearly nobody watched. Scrapping Mid-East peace. Now, there's an idea. About a year ago, the Bush administration invited officials for nearly 50 countries to Annapolis, Maryland for a meeting with Israelis and Palestinians to try to forge peace before the end of the Bush era.

It widely considered the president's attempt to save a sliver of his otherwise, rather soily international legacy. At the time, those talks were deemed a success by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. And the administration vowed to keep working on this until Bush left office. They said they would get a deal before the end of the year.

Well, yesterday, the administration announced, forget it. They called off plans for any further talks before the end of the year. Legacy shmegacy. We've got an environment to wreck while we still have a chance.

They didn't say that thing about the environment, but yes. President Bush's Interior Department is busy relaxing environmental protection rules on mining for uranium within three miles of the Grand Canyon, you know, where the Colorado River runs, the one that provides drinking water for Phoenix, Vegas and L.A.

"Mommy, I didn't ask for lemonade. It's not lemonade, Sweetie. It's the seepage off those radioactive tailings. How much better would it be if January 20th were like tomorrow?

Daily, Maddow links impotent power with irresponsible use of what power Bush has left. So does everyone else. So being a "lame duck" is not just about being ineffective (which is ableist enough by itself), it's also about being an asshole.

7 Wheelchairs reviewed by NYT

Image description: Color photo of Gary Presley's book cover for "7 Wheelchairs: A Life Beyond Polio." A close-up photo of one back wheel of a manual wheelchair.

Gary Presley's new book, 7 Wheelchairs: A Life Beyond Polio, receives a rave review from the New York Times:

Those who prefer their miracles in subtler and more secular form might turn instead to Gary Presley’s extraordinary memoir of a life after polio. No one rises from a wheelchair and walks again in this book, yet the miracles clearly abound.

Mr. Presley was part of the last generation of polio patients in the United States: he became sick in 1959, right after receiving a booster shot of the old Salk vaccine. Whether the illness was from the vaccine or despite it was never clear, and in the end made little difference: within a week both legs were paralyzed, both arms drastically weakened, and he could not breathe.

The primitive respirators of the time saved his life. For months, an iron lung encased him like an oversize Tin Woodsman’s costume, doing the work his own muscles could not do. He was flat on his back, his world limited to what he could see in a small mirror affixed to the top of the machine. (With the mirror tilted correctly, he could watch “noitartnecnoC” and “drowssaP” on television.)

Eventually he graduated to a smaller, more portable lung — a metal carapace that let him sit upright. At night a rocking bed turned him violently on his head and back again to force air in and out of his lungs. Then the hospital sent him home to a small isolated Missouri dairy farm. He was 18 years old.

Mr. Presley writes with candor and precision about every facet of the next five decades. He learned to breathe without machinery, but he never walked again. A voracious reader, he skipped college and settled into a clerical job in a local insurance office. His wheelchairs became faster and sleeker, but his parents helped him dress and bathe until they died. As for toileting: Mr. Presley’s chapter devoted to the mechanics of urination and defecation in the face of paralysis is a tour de force that should be required reading for all.

Who could predict that, finally living on his own in his late 40s, he would fall in love with one of his hired aides? Or that, now approaching 70, his anger and depression faced and pretty much conquered, he would be happily married, healthy, vigorous, productive, in his words, a lucky man? A miracle, indeed.

Congrats, Gary!

When the wheels make the man, part 2

Each incarnation of an ugly news story out of Darwin, Australia, continues to boggle my mind. A 26-year-old man had sex with his disabled, wheelchair-using mother who, when able to get away, told her doctor about the assault.

The first story I saw on this had the lovely headline "Desperate man had sex with wheelchair-bound mum." Apparently, he was so distraught that the ladies don't fancy him that he became "desperate."

And now there's this headline:

Wheelchair incest man jailed in Darwin

Note for clarity's sake that no one committed incest with a chair. Note also that the man was not a chair-user. It's his mother, the victim of sexual assault, who is reduced to being a modifier for her son's act: "wheelchair incest." And finally, note that the man is serving time for incest (because it's illegal to have sex with a close relative), but not for sexual assault or rape.

Because you are nothing without your assistive equipment. See similar post here.

When the wheels make the man

The Desert Sun of Palm Springs, California, ran a short story last week with this headline:

Wheelchair stabber's sentencing delayed

The news is about a man convicted of stabbing and killing a friend over a dispute about a bicycle. No wheelchair was stabbed. No man in a wheelchair was even stabbed. In fact, it's the guy using the wheelchair that committed the crime.

Nice, eh?

Paralympics special airs today on NBC

For Americans who didn't have access to what happened at the Beijing Paralympics this summer (and that would be all of us who don't have easy cable access to foreign TV where coverage did exist), there's a 90-minute special on NBC this afternoon that has gotten some good reviews.

If you want more of the same four years from now, the network needs to know:

It will be aired the (NBC) National Broadcasting Company on Sunday at 2:30 P.M. Eastern Standard time.

And also the Universal Sports Television Network on beginning Monday, Nov. 10th though the 16, at 7:00 PM Eastern Standard Time.

It is important that you tune in to these games because it is perceived as a test by these networks. It will be a test to see if Americans will watch disabled athletes compete in the same events as non disabled athletes.

Those reviews above are positive and supportive of better Paralympic coverage. They also try to be self-aware about the "inspirational" stereotype of disability, with varying success.

If you catch the show, post your thoughts on it in comments. Or, if you had access to coverage back in August and recall your favorite moment or athlete, post that and we can compare notes.

Save Bitch Magazine

Bitch Magazine, one of my favorite magazines, is in desperate need of a little financial help in order to keep publishing "the feminist response to pop culture" they do so well. If you're a supporter, now is the time they need your help. If you're curious what they're all about, subscribe or order a back issue or two.

I'd describe Bitch as disability-friendly, occasionally offering articles from a disability perspective and open to more, if their submissions page is any indication. Future issues will be built around themes of these words: "Buzz," "Consumed", "Art/See", and "Old." Keywords suggested to flesh out those theme words include "pharmacy", "disease and economy", "vision and blindness", and "aging, history and marginalization".

I donated just a few bucks. If you have a few to spare, I believe it's a very worthy publication.

Praying with Lior

I've heard good things about a new documentary film, Praying with Lior, only opening now in a few cities and playing primarily at Jewish film festivals. From the film's website:

An engrossing, wrenching and tender documentary film, Praying with Lior introduces Lior Liebling, also called "the little rebbe." Lior has Down syndrome, and has spent his entire life praying with utter abandon. Is he a "spiritual genius" as many around him say? Or simply the vessel that contains everyone’s unfulfilled wishes and expectations? Lior – whose name means "my light" — lost his mother at age six, and her words and spirit hover over the film. While everyone agrees Lior is closer to God, he’s also a burden, a best friend, an inspiration, and an embarrassment, depending on which family member is speaking. As Lior approaches Bar Mitzvah, the Jewish coming-of-age ceremony different characters provides a window into life spent "praying with Lior." The movie poses difficult questions such as what is "disability" and who really talks to God? Told with intimacy and humor, Praying with Lior is a family story, a triumph story, a grief story, a divinely-inspired story.

It sounds like this could go either way, right? The stereotyping of a child with Down syndrome as closer to God than the rest of us, an inspiration or a burden are themes on developmental disability we've heard many times before.

But filmmaker Ilana Trachtman's motivations as reported by Devorah Shubowitz at Media Rights reveal complexities behind the intent of the documentary:

As Trachtman struggled to focus during a Rosh Hashanah service at Elat Chayyim, a multi-denominational Jewish retreat center in the Catskills, she was mesmerized by the soulfully attentive off-key voice that came from behind her. When she saw the source, a boy with Down syndrome, she was shocked. Lior's praying shattered her expectations of what people with disabilities can do. "He amazed me. He could do something that I can't do -- pray with real concentration in Hebrew and in English. So I stalked him because of my own spiritual curiosity." When Trachtman heard Lior was going to have a Bar Mitzvah, she thought somebody should tell his story on film and shortly after, she decided to be that person....

Audiences may debate whether this photogenic young person's "star quality" sets him apart from other people with disabilities. Some may argue that Lior's integration is dependent upon his recognition by and attractiveness to non-disabled society. Others may think his charisma is connected to his disability. The film certainly brings to the foreground issues of the aesthetics of disability, and non-disability, in film.

Another review at Cinematical also suggests that disability is just one (important) facet of this complex family story about love and religious faith.

Cross-posted at Alas, A Blog

Update: Casting director fired from "Shelter" flick

According to the AP:

A casting director for the horror thriller "Shelter" has been fired after West Virginia Gov. Joe Manchin's office objected to what it termed an insensitive casting call for extras with unusual features that might look inbred.

Donna Belajac Casting's Web site initially advertised the scene as being set in a "West Virginia 'holler,"' but producers Emilio Diez Barroso and Darlene Caamano Loquet said the movie is not set in West Virginia and the state will not even be mentioned.

"On behalf of the entire SHELTER production we regret and are deeply sorry for the very insensitive casting call sent out without our knowledge by our casting director Donna Belajac who has been dismissed from this project as a result," Barroso and Loquet said in a statement issued Tuesday night.

I don't care one way or another about Belajac's firing. It's not a victory for disability awareness if all the brouhaha was because it was offensive to suggest people of a geographical region all look abnormal or disabled. It was the association with abnormality everyone was upset about, not any assumptions about the worth of people who aren't picture perfect.

The movie studio will hire someone careful to not attribute the abnormal "inbred" look of its scary characters to a particular place, and we're all supposed to be placated by that. Rest easy. Be assured that the scary folk in the movie are not "us" and we are not "them."

See previous post here.

Hollywood casting call for that "inbred" look

From the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review (bolded italics are mine):

The announcement -- which was sent out in a news release and posted on the casting company's Web site -- asked for people with the following attributes:

"Extraordinarily tall or short. Unusual body shapes, even physical abnormalities as long as there is normal mobility. Unusual facial features, especially eyes."

The announcement requests "a 9-12-year-old Caucasian girl with an other-worldly look to her."

"Could be an albino or something along those lines -- she's someone who is visually different and therefore has a closer contact to the gods and to magic. 'Regular-looking' children should not attend this open call.'"

Asked if she felt the characterization might be offensive to West Virginians, [Donna] Belajac [of Donna Belajac Casting] said: "We tried to word it in a way that's not offensive. I hope it's not an offensive thing. It's not meant to be a generalization about everyone in West Virginia. That's why we put that it's in a 'holler' in the mountains."

....

"It's the way it was described in the script," Belajac said Monday. "Some of these 'holler' people -- because they are insular and clannish, and they don't leave their area -- there is literally inbreeding, and the people there often have a different kind of look. That's what we're trying to get."

Belajac said the announcement was not meant to stereotype people from West Virginia. But state officials and a history professor called it "unfortunate" that such unfair views of people are being repeated.

"They clearly are not trying to create the image of a quaint, homespun mountain family," said Kevin Barksdale, assistant history professor at Marshall University in Huntington, W.Va. "Clearly, what they're trying to establish is this notion of the hillbilly monster."

The above casting call is for an upcoming horror film called "Shelter" starring Julianne Moore.

The following one is for a movie version of Cormac McCarthy's The Road starring (ATTN: Brownfemipower!) Viggo Mortensen and Charlize Theron:

It's set in a post-cataclysmic America. The few survivors who were not seared by an unspecified fiery disaster are divided into two classes -- barbaric cannibals or their prey.

Men and woman ages 18 to 50 are needed for eight speaking roles and 30 extras.

Producers are looking for people with minimal muscle tone, long stringy hair and a starved, ravaged appearance. They need men capable of growing a full beard.

Also needed: a thin man of any ethnicity who is missing one or both legs. No previous acting experience is needed for this role.

I have a deep, unnatural love for post-apocalyptic fiction, and I recently read McCarthy's Pulitzer-prize-winning novel and found it as riveting as anything I've ever read. I think McCarthy is the great American author living today, and at least one character in another novel of his has had provoking things to say about disability/deformity. (That excerpt from All The Pretty Horses was one of my 2006 blog posts.)

Regarding these casting calls for the unusual, extraordinary, irregular and inbred, I certainly don't have any problem with disabled actors being part of Hollywood. Bring them on, please. But give them roles with humanity and lives beyond their physical attributes.

The movie "Shelter" is clearly working on the theory that physical oddballs and country hicks are effective monsters that provoke horror for their film. When will we get over this? When will the insult of collecting unusual-looking people be seen as complicated and problematic in and of itself and not just because it might suggest insulting things about a geographical region or particular tribe of people?

Notice also, the odder the better, so long as you have no trouble with mobility. That's pretty specific. What's that about? My guess is they've fine-tuned their idea of the grotesque to mean physically strange, but they don't want any mobility aids distracting from the impact of that strangeness. Or maybe they need creepy people capable of chasing the star?

Thanks to Grace for providing the link to the news article.

Cop dumps quadriplegic man out of his wheechair

The story:

Police Suspended for Wheelchair Dumping

TAMPA, Fla. (AP) — Four Hillsborough County sheriff's deputies have been suspended after purposely tipping a quadriplegic man out of his wheelchair at a jail, authorities said Tuesday.

Orient Road Jail surveillance footage from Jan. 29 shows veteran deputy Charlette Marshall-Jones, 44, dumping Brian Sterner out of his wheelchair and searching him on the floor after he was brought in on a warrant after a traffic violation.

Sterner said when he was taken into a booking room and told to stand up, Jones grew agitated when he told her that he could not.

"She was irked that I wasn't complying to what she was telling me to do," he told The Tampa Tribune.

"It didn't register with her that she was asking me to do something I can't do."

Jones has been suspended without pay, and Sgt. Gary Hinson, 51, Cpl. Steven Dickey, 45 and Cpl. Decondra Williams, 36 have also been placed on administrative leave pending an investigation, sheriff's spokeswoman Debbie Carter said.

"The actions are indefensible at every level," Chief Deputy Jose Docobo said. "Based on what I saw, anything short of dismissal would be inappropriate."

He said the officers' actions were an aberration.

Yes, just another story documenting the callous abuse of power by law enforcement. Unbelieveable, but... not, right?

But it's also an example of how inept the media is at covering disability. The Associated Press headline: "Police suspended for wheelchair dumping"

"Wheelchair dumping" is ambiguous, obnoxiously imprecise, and goes for the shock value at the expense of even mentioning the victim involved. "Man dumped from wheelchair by cop" would have preserved the news shock value while also speaking the truth.

In any case, "wheelchair dump" has another meaning. "Dump" (also known as "rake" or "squeeze") refers to the seat angle on a wheelchair. To a seasoned wheelchair user, a story titled "wheelchair dumping" suggests discussion of the intricacies of butt comfort, balance, and leverage to push oneself. To a wheelchair user, the headline is not only insulting, it makes no sense.

The video of the abuse shows the police officer walking behind the man in the wheelchair and abruptly tipping the chair forward so the seat is at much more than a 45-degree angle from normal. Sterner attempts, briefly, to hold onto the arms before falling forward head first and landing hard on the floor. He is then rolled around on the floor and searched before being placed roughly back in his chair. The TV news report showing this video includes footage of Sterner outside, wearing sunglasses and using his arms and hands with some difficulty. He explains to the news camera that he has no feeling from the chest down and did not know at first how badly he was injured from the fall, but thought he might have broken some ribs.

How does this political ad compare to that Nike ad?

The recent Nike ad featuring Paralympian basketball player Matt Scott generated lots of discussion here recently. Here's a political ad (link leads to YouTube video which is also described and embedded below) for an Oregonian candidate for Senate that has some things in common with the Nike ad: Both ads feature disabled men, both ads use disability and stereotypes of it to sell their message, both feature camera angles that highlight physical difference. Both use humor. Both feature the disability as a visual surprise at each ad's conclusion.

What do you think? Apart from what I would expect is a general preference for basketball over politics, do you like one ad more than the other? And why?

Here's an article in The Oregonian about Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Steve Novick, his campaign and how it demonstrates progress for the electability of disabled political candidates.

Description of the video from the article:

The Novick ad is a takeoff on the old TV game show "To Tell the Truth" in which three people all claim to be the same person, and it's up to a panel of celebrities to figure out who's the real one. In the ad, three tallish, handsome, buttoned-down actors claim to be Novick, then the camera pans to Novick himself -- or the tip of his head.

"I don't look like the typical politician, but I won't act like one, either," Novick says in the ad. "I will fight for the little guy."

New Disability Blog Carnival at [with]tv

The latest Disability Blog Carnival is up at [with]tv where Connie Kuusisto (also blogging at Planet of the Blind) has compiled a collection of links on "Disability in the Media." Check it out! 

Cross-posted at Alas, A Blog

Nike ad features Paralympian

It hurts me a little bit to post this ad for discussion. I participated in protests at my university when the sports department contracted with Nike. I overcame my significant fear of public speaking to join with a local union and represent NOW to the Board of Regents. That was a decade ago and Nike still sucks.

But they do have this commercial (also embedded below) airing this weekend that will feature Paralympian basketball player Matt Scott. The news about the ad:

Nike's New Year television commercial will feature University of Wisconsin-Whitewater wheelchair basketball player Matt Scott.

Scott, a senior from Detroit, Mich., and a member of the U.S. Paralympic Basketball team, will appear in Nike's "No Excuses" commercial. The spot is the latest in the company's series of "Just Do It" ads.

Throughout the commercial, Scott bounces a basketball and takes shots at the hoop, while reciting a long list of excuses people use to avoid working out and staying in shape. The spot ends with Scott in his wheelchair, slamming down two basketballs simultaneously and saying the final excuse, "And my feet hurt." He then wheels out of the gymnasium.

The commercial will air on New Year's Eve on ESPN and MTV and on New Year's Day on FOX, ESPN, the NFL Network, BET, the Comedy Channel, FUSE, ABC Family and others.
"Overcoming a disability and striving for athletic excellence is certainly not for the weak," Scott said. "I am proud I was chosen to represent disabled athletes and show that we do not make excuses."

The brief description of the ad above is not bad. Scott is a large attractive black man wearing a black Nike shirt and a black knit cap. The ad is a full minute long and while he offers all the common and ridiculous excuses people give for not exercising, he bounces a basketball out of camera view. The camera moves and the shot is repeatedly edited so that his wheelchair does not show until the final image of him turning and wheeling from the gym.

Katie Jones and Deus ex machina

The story of Katie Jones has been circulating slowly on disability listservs and blogs since the December 9 article in the Chicago Tribune. FRIDA provided an early link to the story, and since then Crip Chick, Shiva, Bint, Trinity, Brownfemipower have all addressed aspects of Katie's story and the larger issues. Comments everywhere have been... illuminating.

I haven't written about this before now because these sorts of articles from the mainstream media -- this one involving children, parental control of a child's well-being, disability prejudice, personhood and consciousness, health care in the U.S., living with the aid of machines, "special needs" schooling, and "right-to-die" versus the right to not be coerced to die -- contain so much information that is either misleading, incomplete or biased that I can't think where to begin.

Katie Jones is a second-grader in Lake County, Illinois, who has severe cerebral palsy and whose parents have sent her to school with a DNR order (Do Not Resuscitate) prominently attached to the back of her wheelchair. Taking that much at face value, the implications for Katie, her parents, her young classmates and school employees are complex and profound.

Add to that some mind-boggling facts about both the case and the media coverage of it: The Tribune article portrays cerebral palsy as a terminal disease, and while I'm not well-versed on the very wide range of abilities and medical issues people with CP possess, none of the many people I have known personally have ever been about to drop dead. So that portrayal is dangerously and cruelly incomplete. The Tribune article doesn't discuss the fact that Katie apparently does communicate thoughts and feelings beyond those independently interpreted by people around her. You must dig to the caption of photo 4 at a sidebar link to even learn she is capable of expressing her feelings at will. And this, at the article's end:

Before the bus arrived, Beth Jones weaved a French braid into the school girl's long brown hair, while Allie [Katie's four-year-old sister] held up a feeding tube. A machine could do the job, but that makes group hugs difficult.

Besides, anything that beeps isn't allowed in the Jones house.

"When we took her home from the hospital, where there were so many machines, we made the no beeping rule," Beth Jones said.

The group hug part is completely untrue. I've had a feeding tube for two years now, and I can say with absolute certainty that there is nothing about attaching a thin plastic tube to the end of it and running that tube to a machine that makes it hard to hug or be physically close to people. It's actually less a problem for physical intimacy than an IV in the top of the hand would be, whether that IV is connected to a hanging bag or a machine. Feeding through the tube manually is a perfectly reasonable way to use the tube since basically this just entails using a giant syringe or holding the tube up and letting gravity allow nutrients to travel gently into the stomach, but attaching falsehood and phobia to machines that do this same task contributes to the pervasive ableist belief that people are better off dead than using medical technology for the long-term.

And the "no beeping rule"? There's the real reason for the DNR right there. Better dead than using a machine that might make some noise.

I understand machines are scary. I get that because I've needed to make my own adjustments to them and also because I see it in peoples' eyes every day. And I do understand people have different points at which they might choose not to live beyond, though I'll add that there seems to be little reflection upon or respect given to the people who live quite happily beyond those points.

I'd like to hear much much more about the Jones' "no beeping rule." Is it because Katie is terrified of the beeping? Does the beeping represent an identifiable point beyond which Katie's parents don't feel they can handle her care? Or is the beeping too public? Too intrusive? Too medical? Why is an alarm that can signal a problem that should be addressed juxtaposed against the myth that without machines Katie will die "peacefully" from choking or suffocation? Why is this type of beeping so forbidden in our technological age where cellphones and dozens of other machines chirp at each of us all day long?

It's not really the beeping, of course. And the answer to Trinity's question:

Now why is [info that Katie shares thoughts via a communication device] tucked away in the photoshoot and not right there by the article, which is written in a way that suggests she is not aware what is happening?

seems to be that it didn't seem relevant to the point of the article. Katie's consciousness and feelings were not important in an article about whether or not she lives or dies and whether or not she gets to go to school in the meantime. What her thoughts about all this might possibly be is not once pondered in the article.

Further discussion can also be found at Wrong Planet, an online forum for people with Asperger's Syndrome.

Cross-posted at Alas, A Blog