Friday, August 18, 2006

Children in nursing homes

Too bored with myself to ponder my opinions today, so here's an excerpt from an editorial piece in last Saturday's The Oregonian:

Oregon has a small but growing population of children who are severely disabled, as The Oregonian's Don Colburn reported this week. Children who get in bad accidents, or who are born prematurely or with birth defects, are more likely to survive today than in the past because of medical advances.

This improved survival rate is a blessing. However, parents of severely disabled children often feel unmoored and alone once they leave the hospital and discover their limits: They're sent home with a child who needs round-the-clock nursing care, who may never get better, and whose needs may not be covered by private insurance....

Then the parents turn to the government for help and discover certain perversions in the law. For example, a child living in a nursing home is automatically eligible for Medicaid, the federal-state health insurance plan for low-income people. A child living at home, however, can't get help from Medicaid unless the family qualifies as poor enough.

This creates several bad choices for parents: They can deliberately impoverish themselves to qualify for Medicaid. They can go broke over time, draining their life savings and shortchanging their other children to pay for a patchwork of in-home care. Or they can try to send their disabled child to a nursing home -- even if the child may not require that level of institutional care.

"It's an agonizing decision, and it's an ongoing one," said May Lee Fay, administrator for the Office of Developmental Disability Services in the Department of Human Services. "There's not a lot of good choices in Oregon for these families."

Oregon can begin to address this problem in two ways. First, state officials can get a federal waiver that would allow all severely disabled children living at home to get Medicaid coverage, regardless of family income. This waiver application process is already under way, but its approval is uncertain.

Second, Oregon lawmakers can keep these children in mind during the next legislative session, while they fund programs for respite care and other at-home assistance. These programs help keep families intact -- and they keep children out of nursing homes, foster care and other costly places of last resort.

It's not only children who shouldn't be institutionalized for financial reasons.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I have two kids and I would do anything for them. and I am of the frame of mind that putting them in an institution would DEFINATELY be my last resort. i brought them into this world and would put my life on the back burner to help them to the best of my ability.
the government does not take into consideration that in some ways it would be cheeper to have the family take care of one at home rather than sending a person to an institution. and the majority of familys are willing to learn what needs to be done and want to do it.
-jen

Anonymous said...

Many families want to do everyhting they can to keep a severely disabled child at home, but this isn't always a perfect world.

My little brother (technically half-brother) was severly brain damaged at the age of 2 and requires 24 hour care. With 2 other children in that home (I lived with my mother, so it was my other half-siblings), it became nearly impossible for any of them to live their lives. I don't even mean social lives - I'm talking day-to-day lives. Food and clothing shopping, getting to and from school and work, etc all become nearly impossible.

I love my little brother with every fiber of my being, but I believe the best place for him is in the nursing home. He gets the round-the-clock care he needs, one of us visits him daily, and his other siblings are not left without proper care.

When he was at home, neither he nor our brother and sisters could receive the care they needed.